Stress Level of Pepper Plants Determines Whether Fusarium Infection Leads to Damage

Excess Hydrogen Peroxide Is a Major Stress Factor

Interviewed by: Ank Van Lier. For: Onder Glas nr 1, January 2026

Fusarium frequently appears in pepper cultivation in drain water, the root system, or the substrate. Recent research shows that the presence of fungal spores does not always lead to problems or plant loss. Whether damage occurs largely depends on the stress level of the crop. One important culprit appears to be the use of stabilized hydrogen peroxide.

Fusarium has caused problems in pepper cultivation for several years. “This fungus leads to significant yield losses in production,” says Petra van der Goes of Plant Quality Solutions. She describes herself as a “forensic expert” in plant health and focuses on uncovering the underlying causes of crop problems.

In the case of Fusarium in peppers, Van der Goes observed something unusual last year. At one production site, she detected Fusarium spores in the drain water, root system, and substrate without the pepper plants showing any disease symptoms. “At another company where spores were found, wilting did occur, but not in the way typical for Fusarium. The roots were evenly light brown, while the central part of the roots was clean. In a Fusarium infection, this central tissue is also discolored. In addition, Fusarium can cause vascular bundles to become blocked, disrupting water transport. That was not the case here. Moreover, the plants were able to recover after adjusting the disinfection method, which is not possible with Fusarium. All of this raised many questions, and I wanted to find answers.”

Due to Fusarium, the vascular bundles become blocked and water transport is disrupted. As a result, the crop becomes limp and significant yield losses occur.

Fungal Spores, No Problems

At the beginning of this year, the plant expert therefore set up her own research. She was able to use the laboratory facilities of Valto Biocontrol, and propagation companies and growers also contributed financially. “My research showed, among other things, that Fusarium spores were regularly present in seed, but that young plants did not become diseased as a result.”

Even after the young plants were placed in a substrate, problems did not occur in most cases. Van der Goes conducted trials with pepper plants on rockwool, coconut, and a peat-based mix. “Although no disease symptoms appeared, I did find Fusarium spores in the drain water, the roots, and the substrate in all these cases.”

ABA and DKPs

At a certain point, however, things did go wrong with the pepper plants grown on rockwool. After a sudden change in weather, a typical Fusarium wilt developed. To explain this, the researcher had a drain water sample analyzed. “The results were striking. The sample contained high concentrations of abscisic acid (ABA). This stress hormone slows growth and regulates water balance. Plants produce this hormone when they experience stress, in this case due to the weather change. As a result, the plant becomes less resilient and sheds tissue, which explains the brown discoloration of the roots.”

In addition to the high levels of stress hormones, there was also a high concentration of diketopiperazines (DKPs). “These secondary metabolites disrupt the hormonal balance in the root zone and are therefore negative for plant growth. The plant itself produces a small amount of DKPs, but most of these metabolites are produced by microorganisms. The Fusarium fungus, among others, produces DKPs, and their production increases when the plant is under stress. These secondary metabolites, in turn, stimulate the production of the ABA stress hormone.”

Stress as a Trigger

The conclusion Van der Goes drew from this was that the presence of Fusarium does not always have major consequences for plant vitality. In other words, plants do not necessarily collapse when fungal spores are detected. “The fungus is often merely a passive inhabitant of the root zone and not always biologically relevant, as we call it. That only becomes the case when the crop is exposed to stress situations. Stress is the trigger for the development of problems and damage caused by Fusarium.”

According to Van der Goes, this creates a vicious circle. The higher the stress level, the more sugars the plant exudes through its roots. “These so-called ‘leaking’ sugars then form a nutrient source for microorganisms in the root system, such as Fusarium. This stimulates the fungus to become more active. If, during the fruiting phase, a high fruit load is added on top of this, it is often the final straw, and the crop loses its vitality and wilts.”

Too Much Hydrogen Peroxide

Why, then, have there been so many Fusarium problems in pepper cultivation in recent years? Which stress factors are responsible? “One major cause is that many pepper growers have significantly increased the use of stabilized hydrogen peroxide for disinfection, due to the loss of crop protection products and in an effort to keep Fusarium under control. However, hydrogen peroxide is an aggressive oxidant that causes considerable stress to the crop, especially on rockwool. With organic substrates, the problem is less severe because they can break down the peroxide more effectively. This partly explains why Fusarium problems are more pronounced on rockwool.”

In addition, the previously mentioned DKPs, which are also negative for plant growth, reach the plant more quickly in rockwool than in organic substrates. “This is because rockwool is an inert substrate, meaning DKPs bind less readily to other microorganisms.”

Closed cultivation systems also cause stress for the plant, Van der Goes notes. “Through recirculation, residues and negative elements such as DKPs are continuously circulated. You cannot get rid of them, and their concentrations build up. Pepper plants do not thrive under those conditions either.”

Preventing Stress

To prevent problems, it is therefore essential to keep the stress level of pepper plants as low as possible. But how can growers do this? “Limit the use of hydrogen peroxide as much as possible. It does more harm than good. We also need to move away from the idea that water must be 100 percent clean.”

She also advises enriching the substrate microbiome with biostimulants and biofungicides, which increases the crop’s resilience against the fungus. “It is especially important to have a high diversity of microorganisms present in the microbiome.”

Caution is also advised when reusing substrate. “Not only with rockwool, but also with, for example, coconut and peat-based substrates. Fusarium spores are present there as well and can build up with reuse.”

Fusarium-Free Seed as the Ultimate Solution

Finally, Van der Goes advises ensuring optimal crop management. “By that I mean supporting the plant when needed. If, for example, a major weather change is coming, provide extra amino acids and plant extracts to help the plant cope. This improves stress tolerance and reduces the likelihood that Fusarium spores will lead to problems.”

According to the researcher, the ultimate solution lies in seed that is free of Fusarium spores. “But that is difficult, because seed suppliers do not feel a sense of urgency. After all, the spores are not biologically relevant in young plants, as my trials also showed. As a result, seed companies do not see the need to address this issue.”

Summary

Fusarium spores are common in pepper cultivation, but research shows that damage only occurs when plants experience stress. In particular, high doses of stabilized hydrogen peroxide are a major stress factor, and recirculation also has a negative effect. Limiting the use of hydrogen peroxide, maintaining a diverse substrate microbiome, careful handling of substrate reuse, and good crop management can help prevent and reduce problems.

Case Study: When Growing Conditions Tip the Balance in Xanthomonas Infections

A few years ago, strawberry plants of a well-known cultivar were propagated under controlled conditions. Inspections during the season found nothing unusual — clean mother plants, a new tray field, no water recirculation, and routine checks all gave the green light.

Yet once plants were distributed, a puzzling pattern emerged. Some growers reported heavy outbreaks of Xanthomonas fragariae, while others with plants from the very same source saw little to no issue.

Why such a difference? The answer lies not only in the presence of the bacterium, but in the growing environment that favors its development.

  • The bacterium enters leaves through stomata and thrives in high humidity with free moisture on foliage.
  • Temperatures of 18–24 °C accelerate its growth.
  • Young, tender leaves are especially vulnerable.
  • High nitrogen fertilization makes plants lush, but also more susceptible.
  • Water splash and crop handling can move the bacterium from plant to plant.

In some fields, these conditions lined up perfectly — turning a hidden, symptomless infection into a rapid epidemic. In others, the environment was less favorable, and the disease failed to establish.

  • Even when plant material appears “clean,” opportunistic pathogens can strike if conditions align.
  • Strict sanitation, careful nitrogen management, and minimizing leaf wetness are essential preventive steps.
  • Early detection through scouting and diagnostic testing helps prevent widespread spread.

The key insight: Xanthomonas infections are as much about the crop’s environment as about the pathogen itself. A clean start is important, but staying clean requires vigilance against the growing conditions that give the bacterium its opportunity.

How Risk Assessment Helped Uncover the Source of a Plant Health Crisis

In a recent project, large-scale plant losses in asparagus production raised urgent questions. Symptoms included shortened and fibrous root crowns, cracked and discolored roots, unpleasant odors, and disrupted stem growth. Lab analysis revealed heavy infections with Fusarium oxysporum and Cylindrocarpon didymum. Although Phytophthora was tested, it was not detected. The strong odor suggested a secondary Erwinia infection.

A structured risk assessment was key to moving beyond symptoms and lab results. During the sessions, we traced the most likely origin of the widespread issue back to a practice a few years earlier: shredding crop residues on the windward side of the growing area. This led to contaminated dust entering the basins and irrigation system. While disinfection systems were in place, no method is 100% effective, especially when particle loads are high and water turbidity reduces efficacy. This provided a pathway for infection across the entire facility.

The assessment also highlighted contributing factors:

  • Prohibition of certain chemical seed treatments, leaving only water-dipping as a preventive step.
  • Movement of plants between plots, increasing cross-contamination risk.
  • An existing background level of infection, amplifying new outbreaks.

With this understanding, we designed a multi-step plan of action:

  • Knowledge transfer on pathogen lifecycles and symptom recognition.
  • Trials combining nutrition strategies with biological controls (“measure to manage”).
  • Revision of hygiene protocols, co-created with cultivation staff for ownership.
  • Optimized plant flow to protect young seedlings.
  • Field sanitation and soil reset trials.
  • Treatment strategies for new plants entering production.
  • Ongoing training in pathogen identification, supported by lab analysis.

Next to tackling the plant health issues, fertilization practices were also adjusted to better support root health and resilience. The results spoke for themselves: already in the first year after implementation, 80% fewer issues were recorded.

The outcome of this process was not only the identification of the likely cause but also a clear pathway to reduce risks and prevent recurrence. By combining scientific analysis with practical on-site risk assessment, it became possible to transform a widespread challenge into a structured recovery plan.

Wilting Strawberry Plants? Don’t Just Blame Neopestalotiopsis

Positive PCR but no active growing Neopestalotiopsis

When strawberry plants start to wilt, it’s easy to point the finger at Neopestalotiopsis. Especially when PCR results come back positive. But let’s take a moment to understand what that actually means. PCR confirms the presence of DNA, not necessarily a living, active fungus. So yes, Neopestalotiopsis might be there – or it was there – but it’s not the whole story.

Plating Neopestalotiopsis

When we plate these plants, we often see a much more complex picture. Multiple pathogens show up: Fusarium spp., Colletotrichum, Cylindrocarpon, Phytophthora, and Neopestalotiopsis. In other words, this is not a single-pathogen issue. We’re dealing with a disease complex – and more importantly, a root rot – above ground disease complex.

Focusing only on leaf infections caused by Neopestalotiopsis could lead you to overlook the more serious threat lurking below ground. Root rot quietly wipes out your plants, and by the time it becomes visible, it’s often too late.

Going heavy on fungicides might seem like a quick fix, but be careful, this can backfire. Overapplication leads to extra plant stress, and stressed plants are more vulnerable to root pathogens. Plants can’t fight on two fronts at once. If all their energy goes into managing chemical stress and foliar infections, the roots become an easy target.

I have been analysing plants in the Netherlands as well as Canada. They tell the same story. We have a disease complex, not just Neo-P.

error: Content is protected !!